A pipeline, not a prompt.
Maark does not write your article in one giant call. It moves each piece through named stages — research, outline, writing, internal linking, editing — and then a separate review checks the result before it ever reaches you. You approve what ships.
Every article moves through the same steps, in order
Each stage does one job and hands off to the next. That is what makes the output consistent — and what lets a review at the end actually mean something.
An independent review that can hold a draft
Before a draft reaches your queue, a separate review stage checks it — and it has the authority to send it back.
Two things make the review meaningful: the reviewer belongs to a different model family than the writer, so it is not grading its own work, and it checks statements against material it fetches rather than trusting the draft. When a project has review enforcement turned on, a held draft is routed through the repair loop instead of published. Enforcement is a setting, and we are honest about that: on projects where it is off, the review still runs and records its verdict, so you see the same signal before you approve.
It fills a calendar and produces on a schedule — review-first
After onboarding, Maark proposes a topic calendar from your Keyword Universe. Production runs on that schedule, and every finished piece lands in a review queue, not on your site.
A calendar you can see on day zero
A daily review email
Hands-off is opt-in, and off by default
Where it publishes — and what it will not do
Publishes to Shopify, or your draft library
It will not invent proof
The calendar draws its topics from your Keyword Universe, and you can drive the whole pipeline from your own assistant through AI Connections. See how it reads for agencies on the agencies page.
Put the pipeline to work
Connect your data and see the calendar fill with topics from your own site — no card required.